
Most packaging plant owners don't lose money in one big dramatic moment. They lose it in a slow, quiet drip—and quotes that go nowhere are one of the biggest leaks.

I'm about to show you a number that's going to make you uncomfortable.
$36,000.
That's how much you're burning per sales rep, per year, on quotes that die in silence.
And I can prove it with simple math.
If you own or run a packaging plant or any B2B manufacturing operation this one's going to sting. But you need to see it.
Most packaging plant owners don't lose money in one big dramatic moment. No single catastrophic decision. No obvious villain.
They lose it in a slow, quiet drip that never shows up on a P&L line item.
One of the biggest drips?
Quotes that go nowhere.
Your team spends real time, real payroll dollars, preparing quotes:
Chasing specs
Confirming lead times
Running numbers with the plant
Formatting proposals
Emailing back and forth
Then what happens?
One email goes out.
Maybe one follow-up call.
The buyer goes quiet.
Your rep moves on to the next fire.
And that quote? It just... dies.
Multiply that across weeks, months, years, and you've got a cash vacuum sitting right in the middle of your sales process.
In 2025, that's the kind of leak that pushes good plants into desperate decisions:
Taking bad business at cost
Cutting good people
Accepting a lowball offer from a competitor just to get out
Let me show you the math that should terrify you.
Forget AI. Forget buzzwords. Let's just talk numbers.
Imagine a plant doing $15M–$30M in revenue.
Nothing huge. Nothing tiny. A solid mid-sized packaging operation.
Now look at one salesperson or CSR:
They handle, say, 50 quotes per month (some small, some large).
Preparing a quote takes 30–90 minutes when you add up:
Email back-and-forth
Getting artwork or specs
Checking with scheduling or ops
Pricing, freight, margins
Typing and formatting the final proposal
Let's be conservative: 45 minutes per quote.
50 quotes × 0.75 hours = 37.5 hours per month of quote work per rep.
That's one full week every month just building quotes.

Now ask yourself:
What percentage of those quotes get real, consistent follow-up?
Not "I called once" or "I sent a nudge."
I mean a simple, predictable pattern:
Follow-up at 2 days
Follow-up at 7 days
Follow-up at 14 days
Final check-in: "Yes, no, or not now?"
For most plants I talk to, the honest answer is:
"We don't know. It depends. It's in our reps' inboxes."
Which is another way of saying:
"We have no idea how much of that time and payroll is being thrown in the trash."
1. The cost of the work
The hours your people spend putting it together.
Their salary, benefits, and overhead.
2. The cost of the silence
Lost deals that could've been won with just a bit more persistence
Lost information (you never find out why you lost)
Lost future opportunities (that contact goes somewhere else and takes their business with them)
Let's stay conservative.
If a rep's all-in cost (salary + commission + benefits + overhead) is $120,000/year, that's roughly $10,000/month.
If 25–30% of their time is spent on quotes and quote-related stuff, that's $2,500–$3,000 per month per rep just on quoting.
And if you don't have a real follow-up system?
A chunk of that $2,500–$3,000/month per rep is buying you:
Quotes that die in inboxes
Deals that go to louder or more consistent competitors
Absolutely no learning about what's working or failing
Stretch that across a year:
$3,000/month × 12 months = $36,000/year per rep burned on quotes where the follow-up is "random at best."
How many reps or CSRs do you have doing this?
Multiply.
That's not "extra" margin.
That's money already going out the door.
Here's the uncomfortable truth in most packaging companies:
Everybody believes "we follow up."
Almost nobody can show proof.
If I ask:
"Can you pull a list of every quote over the last 90 days and show me which ones got 2–3 follow-ups?"
Most places can't.
They can search emails. They can dig through spreadsheets. They can call a few reps and ask, "Hey, what happened with Company X?"
But they can't see it in one place, and they can't manage it.
So, what happens?
Your best, loudest, neediest customers get follow-up because they scream.
Everyone else gets "when I remember" or "when I have time."
And the quiet buyers the ones who don't chase you but will gladly give their money to the competitor who stayed present?
They quietly move on.
You don't get a phone call saying, "We chose someone else because they were more consistent."
You just stop getting orders.
The market you're in is changing whether you acknowledge it or not:
Bigger, more sophisticated buyers
More demand for speed, flexibility, and reliability
More pressure on price and margin
Buyers are busy. They're drowning in emails, vendors, and internal fires.
They are not going to chase your reps for answers.
They're going to work with whoever makes it:
Easiest to get answers
Easiest to get clear pricing and options
Easiest to trust that nothing will fall through the cracks
If your sales process is still:
Quotes built by hand
Follow-up living in individual inboxes
No visibility into what happens after a quote goes out
…then what you really have is hope, not a system.
And "hope" is not a strategy for 2025.
It's a plan to eventually be forced into:
Selling at a bad price
Selling your company
Or cutting people you genuinely care about just to keep the lights on
This is where a lot of owners tap out:
They hear "CRM," "AI," "automation," and their eyes glaze over.
It sounds expensive. It sounds complicated. It sounds like a whole new language.
Let me reframe it in plain English:
You don't need to become a tech company.
You need three simple things:
1. A list of every quote you've sent
In one place.
With basic info: company, amount, date sent, rep.
2. A simple, repeatable follow-up pattern
"Every quote above $X gets at least 3 touches in 21 days."
Not heroic. Not optional. Just the rule.
3. A basic system that does the nagging for you
Something that:
Reminds your team who to follow up with today
Tracks who replied and who didn't
Shows you, as the owner, what's happening without having to dig through everyone's inbox
Under the hood, sure, there may be software or even some AI helping organize and prioritize this.
But you don't have to care about the buzzwords.
You only have to care about:
✅ Fewer quotes dying in silence
✅ Better use of the payroll you're already paying
✅ More deals won from the same number of opportunities
That's it.

What This Looks Like in Real Life
Picture a normal Monday in your plant.
Today (the way it usually works):
Reps open their inbox and start reacting.
They dig through old threads: "Who did I forget to call?"
They respond to squeaky-wheel customers and the latest fire.
Half the quotes from the last 30 days get zero structured follow-up.
You, as the owner, ask:
"What's going on with that big opportunity with XYZ Brands?"
You get an answer like:
"Yeah, I think I followed up… I'm waiting to hear back."
Which really means: "I don't have a system. I'm hoping they call me."
Now picture this instead:
Every morning, each rep has a short, clear list:
These 10 quotes to follow up on
These 5 accounts that haven't ordered in 90 days
These 3 opportunities that need a decision
The system has already:
✅ Logged who opened the last email
✅ Logged who clicked on the quote
✅ Logged who hasn't responded at all
You, as the owner, can see at a glance:
How many quotes went out last week
How many got at least 2–3 follow-ups
Which big-dollar opportunities are still hanging
Is there some tech behind that? Yes.
Do you need to understand the tech to benefit from it? No.
You just need to decide:
"We are not going to keep paying for quotes that vanish into thin air."
Before you touch any tool, ask yourself:
"Do I actually know what happens to quotes after they leave our building?"
"Can I see, in one place, which ones are alive and which ones are dead?"
"Am I okay paying thousands of dollars per rep, per month, for work that may never even get a fair chance to close?"
If the honest answer is "no" or "I don't know," then you don't have a technology problem yet.
You have a visibility and discipline problem.
Tech just makes the discipline easier to live with.
If You're an Owner and This Hit a Nerve…
You're not alone.
Most packaging plants are still relying on:
Individual memory
Heroic effort
And inbox archaeology
…to manage millions of dollars in opportunities.
In a calmer market, you can get away with that.
In a tighter, more competitive, more demanding market?
That's how good companies slowly slide into trouble.
You don't need to understand AI.
You do need to stop burning money on quotes that never had a real shot.
Ready to Stop the Bleeding?
If you want to talk about what a simple, no-jargon version of a better sales system could look like in your plant, I'm happy to walk through it no buzzwords, just numbers and risk.
Because "quotes that go nowhere" aren’t just annoying.
It's one of the main ways strong packaging companies quietly bleed out.
Next Steps:
Book a Visibility Blueprint Call - 90-minute deep dive to uncover where your quotes are dying
Watch the Full Video Breakdown - See the complete math and solution on YouTube
Related Articles:
About David Marinac:
David Marinac has 35+ years of experience in the packaging industry and is the founder of the AI Sales Machine for B2B manufacturers. He helps packaging plants stop wasting money on tactics that don't work and build systems that generate revenue-ready opportunities.





